Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Runyan Heating & Cooling Services, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1996No. WD 50578PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Marty Perkins appeals from a verdict in this personal injury action assessing 90% fault to him and 10% fault to the defendant, *839Runyan Heating & Cooling Services, Inc. (“Runyan”). Perkins contends that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his Batson challenge to Runyan’s use of a peremptory strike of an African-American venireperson; (2) the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his receipt of workers’ compensation benefits and a third-party settlement; (3) the trial court erred in giving a comparative fault instruction, because there was no evidentiary basis for any assertion of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowls v. ScarboroughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Ford v. GordonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API