Perkins v. Runyan Heating & Cooling Services, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Marty Perkins appeals from a verdict in this personal injury action assessing 90% fault to him and 10% fault to the defendant, *839Runyan Heating & Cooling Services, Inc. (“Runyan”). Perkins contends that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his Batson challenge to Runyan’s use of a peremptory strike of an African-American venireperson; (2) the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his receipt of workers’ compensation benefits and a third-party settlement; (3) the trial court erred in giving a comparative fault instruction, because there was no evidentiary basis for any assertion of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bowls v. ScarboroughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Ford v. GordonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999