Legal Opinion

James v. McCann

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1892No. 14821PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus from the Supreme Court to the judge of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the defendant to settle a certain bill of exceptions; and it was submitted upon a demurrer to the complaint or petition.

The plaintiff (or petitioner), Sarah M. James, and one Leonora A. James, were hostile contestants in the court of the defendant (or respondent) for letters of administration on the estate of William E. James, deceased. That contest, after a full trial, was decided by the court in favor of said Leonora, and judgment was entered accordingly. The petitioner herein (Sarah) then duly filed her notice of and undertaking on appeal;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pratt v. BrowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Stevens v. TrumanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Taylor v. McConigleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API