Seibert v. Noble
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SCHULTZ, Judge.
This is a multi-count action by the owner of farm implements seeking damages from an implement dealer and a bank for the wrongful sale of the implements and the application of the proceeds to pay the owner’s debt and the cost of sale. The owner, Edwin Seibert (Seibert), commenced this action against Daryl Noble, Bohrofen Implement Company, Inc., owned by Noble and his wife Joann, and the Brenton State Bank (bank). Following Noble’s death, his estate was substituted as a defendant. Because the interest of Noble and Bohrofen are similar, we shall simply refer to them as Noble.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chariton Feed and Grain, Inc. v. HarderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Coffel v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bates v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Yeager and Sullivan, Inc. v. Farmers BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Welke v. City of DevenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1994
- IBP, Inc. v. FDL Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998