Legal Opinion
Murillo v. Porteus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 31, 2013PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Geoffrey Porteus and Kristen Porteus appeal, as *751limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), dated June 27, 2011, as granted the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 for the imposition of sanctions on the ground of spoliation of evidence to the extent of directing that, in the event the plaintiff hires an expert to determine whether a certain table saw depicted in a photograph is the same piece of equipment purchased by the defendant Hawk Shaw Golf Course…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ortega v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gogos v. Modell's Sporting Goods, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Ifraimov v. Phoenix Industrial GasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Molinari v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Thornhill v. A.B. VolvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lorenzo v. 7201 Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Murillo v. PorteusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Murillo v. PorteusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- SM v. Plainedge Union Free Sch. Dist.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018