Legal Opinion
Thornhill v. A.B. Volvo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 14, 2003PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries based on strict products liability, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R.E. Rivera, J.), dated April 8, 2002, which granted the defendants’ separate motions to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them based on her spoliation of evidence.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The plaintiff commenced this action, asserting causes of action sounding in strict products liability, seeking damages…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Horace Mann Insurance v. E.T. Appliances, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Behrbom v. Healthco International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lawson v. Aspen Ford, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Simmons v. PierceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Cameron v. Nissan 112 Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Lentini v. WeschlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Neal v. Easton Aluminum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.