United States v. One Pontiac Coupe Automobile
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, District Judge.
This is an attempt by the United States to invoke the provisions of section 3450 (26 USCA §§ 1181, 1182; Comp. St. § 6352) to forfeit an automobile on the ground that the automobile was at the time and place of its seizure “then and there being used as a place for the deposit and concealment of a quantity, to wit, 20 grains, of morphine, on which morphine the tax imposed by law had not been paid, and with the intent to defraud the United States of such tax.”
The evidence establishes that the automobile, just prior to its seizure, had been used by Emma Kirksey, with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. One Ford Automobile TruckDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
- Commercial Credit Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- United States v. One Kissel Touring AutomobileDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. One Ford Coupe Automobile, 1934 Model, Motor No. 18-1049806District Court, W.D. Texas · 1939