Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Burlington Tennis Associates (In re Burlington Tennis Associates)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont

Decided July 22, 1983No. Bankruptcy No. 82-189; Adv. No. 82-0168Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHARLES J. MARRO, Bankruptcy Judge.

On October 1,1982 David M. Farrell (Farrell) filed a request under Bankruptcy Code (Code) section 362(d) for relief from the automatic stay of Code section 362(a). With the consent of the parties the hearing on the request was continued from time to time and the final hearing was held on June 30, 1983. Farrell seeks relief in order to bring an action in ejectment against the Debtor, Burlington Tennis Associates (BTA), which entity is Farrell’s lessee. Farrell also filed a request under Code section 363(e) for adequate protection of his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

In Re Comcoach Corporation, Debtor-Appellee, the Roslyn Savings Bank v. Comcoach CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
Palmer v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
In Re Sapolin Paints, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1980
In Re Bermec Corporation, Debtor, Pacar Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
Van Dyke v. ColeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.