State ex rel. Schroeder v. Perkins
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Selden P. Spencer, Judge. STATEMENT OE THE CASE. In 1898, George E. Perkins and Ralph W. Perkins, a partnership, commenced an action by attachment against the Oanmann-Yoelkers Eisli Company, a corporation, in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis. An attachment writ was issued and certain personal property was levied on by the sheriff.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Selden P. Spencer, Judge. STATEMENT OE THE CASE. In 1898, George E. Perkins and Ralph W. Perkins, a partnership, commenced an action by attachment against the Oanmann-Yoelkers Eisli Company, a corporation, in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis. An attachment writ was issued and certain personal property was levied on by the sheriff. Afterwards, an indemnity bond was given to the sheriff by the attaching plaintiffs, with the National Surety Company as their surety. The pr'esent action was brought on that bond by the State of Missouri at…
1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.
In the view we take of this case, there is only one point which need be considered; the validity of the deed of trust executed in the name of the Canmann-Voelkers Fish Company to Kelly. The court instructed the jury to find the issues for the plaintiff as to any of the goods which they might believe from the evidence never belonged to said company, nor came into the possession of the relators through it; and inasmuch as the jury returned a verdict for defendants, it must be taken for granted they found all the goods in question originally belonged to that company.
Any infirmity in the title of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Calumet Paper Co. v. Haskell Show Printing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Hall v. Farmers & Merchants' BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Musser v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Watson v. WellsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
- Hyde v. LarkinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaufman v. HenryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Lewis, Hubbard & Co. v. PughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
- Maryland Finance Corp. v. DuvallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922