Legal Opinion

Bross v. Stancliff

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County.— ’ Hon. Harris Robinson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, P. J.

Plaintiff, assignee for the purpose of collection only, brought this suit on a promissory note dated June 19, 1914, due on or before January 1, 1915, for $1050, hearing six per cent interest, payable to H. T. Folsom and signed by the defendant. The note contained a clause stating that to secure the payment thereof the maker had attached as collateral security fifteen shares of the capital stock of the Standard Motor and Manufacturing Company, and that all dividends pending life of this loan should be paid to the holder of-the note.

The answer set up the defense, First, that the note was given…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Third National Bank v. St. Charles Savings BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. J. W. Jenkins Sons Music Co. v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Helmrichs v. GehrkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  4. Chilton v. HalsteadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Strauss v. American Chewing Gum Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scullin Steel Co. v. Mississippi Valley Iron Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  2. Gideon v. TeedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Rubinic v. SabadosMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API