Legal Opinion

Strauss v. American Chewing Gum Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Eon. Matt. G. Reynolds, Judge. Tbe defendant’s evidence as to tbe razors being warranted by plaintiff was insufficient as a matter of law for tbe following reasons: 1. Tbe alleged warranty madé at tbe time of tbe alleged change of price from $4.10 to $4 per set was not established, because tbe warranty depends on a change in tbe contract which change could only have been made for a new consideration or by mutual consent.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Eon. Matt. G. Reynolds, Judge. Tbe defendant’s evidence as to tbe razors being warranted by plaintiff was insufficient as a matter of law for tbe following reasons: 1. Tbe alleged warranty madé at tbe time of tbe alleged change of price from $4.10 to $4 per set was not established, because tbe warranty depends on a change in tbe contract which change could only have been made for a new consideration or by mutual consent. Thayer on Contracts, sec. 179. 2. .The alleged warranty was oral and within tbe Statute of Frauds. R. S. 1899, sec. 3418; Galway…

1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.

'The action- is to recover on the following account:

“American CheAving Gum Company, St. Louis, M'o.
“Bought of Adolph Strauss & Co., Importers and Commission Merchants. Sole agents for Messner Harmonicas and Wm. Elliott & Company Cutlery, 412 Broadway. 30 days extra.

*112Nov. 3, 1906.

2538 200 Doz. Knives. 150 to *

702' 17 Doz. Razors. 51 CO

720' 34 Doz. do. 102 CO

722 34 Doz. do. 102 CO

723 34 Doz. do. 102 CO

725 34 Doz. do. 102 CO

726 34 Doz. do. . 102 CO

543 17 Doz. do. . 51 CO

762

Nov. 13, 1906.

7163 7% Dro. Glass Charm Compasses .7.50 56.20

Special 227 Sets Razors . 4.10 930.70

Nov. 19, 1906.

Special 150…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cornell v. Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. Marcrome Art Marble Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Bross v. StancliffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API