Legal Opinion
Roddy v. Canine Officer
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided November 18, 2003No. IP 02-0547-C-H/KPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ADOPTION OF RECOMMENDATION
HAMILTON, District Judge.
The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation. Counsel were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this court to file objections. No objections were filed. The court, having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report, and being duly advised, approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, (1) Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their complaint is DENIED; (2) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment with respect to the individual defendants Canine Office and Officer #2 is…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Todero v. BlackwellDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019