Legal Opinion

Claim of Kaye v. Brewster Central School District Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 4, 1983, which ruled that the employer discharged claimant in violation of section 120 of the Workers’ Compensation Law. H Claimant, a school bus driver, was a probationary employee of the school district when, on January 26, 1981, she suffered a compensable, work-related injury. As a result, she was unable to work from January 27 until February 1 and from February 4 until February 9. On February 12, she was discharged effective February 27, the work day prior to the last day of her probationary period. No reason was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. SapierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. King v. SapierNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Lo Dolce v. Regional Transit Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. In re the Claim of Griffin v. Eastman Kodak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Claim of Griffin v. Eastman Kodak Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Claim of Klimczak v. General Crushed Stone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. O'Malley v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Claim of Kaye v. Brewster Central School District Boarl of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. In re the Claim of Oglesby v. City of NewburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API