Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Griffin v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 12, 1981PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 21, 1980. The narrow issue presented on this appeal is whether an employer violates section 120 of the Workers’ Compensation Law by terminating an employee, who previously has been warned about excessive absences, after the employee is again absent, where the latter absence is due to a work-related compensable injury. Section 120 provides that “It shall be unlawful for any employer *** to discharge *** an employee *** because such employee has claimed or attempted to claim compensation from such employer”. This court has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lo Dolce v. Regional Transit Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Claim of Duncan v. New York State Developmental CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Galante v. Sandoz, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  3. Kern v. South Baltimore General HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Yockey v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. Ramirez v. IBP, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API