Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Stockton Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 27, 1966No. Civ. 678PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from the denial of a writ of mandate by which he sought to be restored to “permanent employment” in the “classified service” of Stockton Unified School District. He first went to work for the district in 1952, as a truck driver; the employment was authorized by the State Department of Education, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation ; at that time Mr. Hamilton was a partially disabled person due to a shortening of one of his legs and the consequent tilting of his pelvis; however, he was passed as physically fit to work for the respondent at the time of employment; in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Neal v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pasadena Unified School District v. Commission on Professional CompetenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Hollon v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Atmel Corp. v. VITESEE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Freeman v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. of LouisvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Goddard v. South Bay Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.