Legal Opinion

Lalonde v. Renaud

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 29, 1989No. 86-533PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

Defendants appeal from a trial court judgment declaring that a lot to which defendants claimed title was park area, as designated in the developer’s subdivision plans. We affirm.

All parties are owners of lots in the so-called Kirk and Fitts development, which was created in 1957 and is adjacent to Lake Champlain in Alburg. Plaintiffs collectively own seven lots in the subdivision, but only plaintiffs Jacques and Therese Lalonde purchased their property from the developers, in 1966. All of the plaintiffs’ deeds refer to a map, which the trial court found was recorded1 and which depicted an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitton v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. Tesson v. Porter Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Clearwater Realty Co. v. BouchardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Regan v. Pomerleau, DeForest Realty, Inc. and City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. Noble v. KalangesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  3. Bosley v. BAC Home Loan Servicing L.P. (In Re Bosley)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2011
  4. Noble v. KalangesVermont Superior Court · 2004
  5. Regan v. PomerleauVermont Superior Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API