Noble v. Kalanges
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶ 1. In this appeal, we consider whether plaintiffs have the right to prevent defendant from developing his property, which at one time was designated on a subdivision plat as “reserved” for an elementary school. Plaintiffs argue that because their deeds reference the subdivision plat, they acquired an implied easement that limited the use of the site to a school. Alternatively, they argue that through a reversionary clause of a 1985 warranty deed, they acquired an equitable servitude that required the site to remain open space. The trial court rejected these arguments and granted summary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kipp v. Chips EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Richart v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Ute Park Summer Homes Ass'n v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- McDonough v. WW Snow Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Lane v. Town of GraftonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chase v. BowenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Regan v. Pomerleau, DeForest Realty, Inc. and City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Guibord v. ScholtzSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Choiniere v. MarshallVermont Superior Court · 2013
- Regan v. PomerleauVermont Superior Court · 2011