Legal Opinion
Levine v. City of Alameda
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 13, 2008No. 06-15480, 06-15481PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Edward Levine filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Alameda (“City”) and James M. Flint, both individually and as City Manager, alleging that the defendants violated his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. On February 17, 2004, Flint told Levine, a property manager for the City, that he was going to be laid off. Levine wrote Flint a letter in which he requested a pretermination hearing regarding his lay off. Levine believed that the lay off was a pretext and that he was being terminated because Flint disliked him.
After receiving the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mabe v. San Bernardino CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Jeffers v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Van Ort v. Estate of StanewichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Ewing v. City of StocktonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Edgerly v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Williams v. Alhambra School District No. 68District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- Fisher v. KealohaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Ortiz v. LopezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.