Legal Opinion
AP MOLLER-MAERSK A/S v. Ocean Express Miami
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 5, 2008No. 06 Civ. 2778PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
A.P. MOLLER MAERSK A/S (“Plaintiff’ or “Maersk”) has moved for an order (1) for partial summary judgment enforcing the COGSA $500 package limitation defense; and (2) enjoining Comercializado-ra de Calidad, Sociedad Anónima (“Defendant” or “Quality Print”) from proceeding with litigation on the merits relating to the shipment at issue in this case in any forum other than the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in accordance with the forum selection clause incorporated in the contract of carriage. For the reasons stated below,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S v. Ocean Express MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- HDI Global Insurance Co. v. Kuehne + Nagel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025