Legal Opinion

David William Knarr v. District Attorney Doug Marteeny

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 20, 2026No. 6:26-cv-01408Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION DAVID WILLIAM KNARR, Civ. No. 6:26-cv-01408-AA Plaintiff, OPINION & ORDER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY DOUG MARTEENY, Defendant. _______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge. Self-represented Plaintiff David William Knarr seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s IFP Petition, ECF No. 2, is GRANTED. However, the Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED without leave to amend. LEGAL STANDARD Generally, all parties instituting any civil action in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Raymond Watison v. Mary CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API