Legal Opinion
Tanksley & Associates v. Willard Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 27, 1997No. C-1-96-512PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (doc # 3). For reasons more fully set forth below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is hereby DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
This action arises out of a claim of wrongful termination. The Plaintiffs, Tanksley & Associates, Spring City Sales Associates, and Arvalda Corp. (“Sales Associates”) are former manufacturer’s sales representatives of the Defendant, Willard Industries, Inc. ('Willard Industries”) who were…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. Dunn, Captain McAlister Lieutenant Dunn, Officer Boehm, Officer Paul AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Soberay MacHine & Equipment Company, (96-3946 97-3308)/cross-Appellee v. Mrf Limited, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant (96-3997)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Bamcor LLC v. Jupiter Aluminum Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
- CDM Manufacturing Co. v. Complete Sales Representation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Canal Insurance Company v. Paul Bunyan, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Soberay MacHine & Equipment Company, (96-3946 97-3308)/cross-Appellee v. Mrf Limited, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant (96-3997)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999