Murphy v. Bradley
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This suit was brought by appellee to recover a commission on the sale of certain real estate in the city of El Dorado. In support of his cause of action, appellee testified that, while the property had not been listed with him for sale, he had been authorized by appellant to sell it at a net price of $7,500, his compensation being any excess over that amount'. He knew that one Tanner was interested in the property, and he priced it to Tanner at $8,000, but failed to make the sale. He told appellant about the offer he had made Tanner, and placed appellant' and Tanner in contact with each…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Leicht-Benson Realty & Construction Corp. v. J. D. Stone & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Johnson v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bates v. Old Mac Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Hartzog v. DeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- O'Glee v. TriggDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1967
- Oliver v. Dent, AdministratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Youngblood v. KuhnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949