Legal Opinion
Flanzbaum v. M & M Transportation Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 15, 1962No. Civ. No. 17751PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, District Judge.
Plaintiff shipper sues in the right of an alleged initial common carrier to recover against an alleged connecting carrier under the Carmack Amendment (49 U.S.C.A. §§ 20(12), 319) for the amount of damages the initial carrier was required to pay the plaintiff shipper for injuries to the shipper’s goods allegedly sustained on the line of the connecting carrier. The facts, separately found, are plain.
Plaintiff delivered about a thousand storage batteries in 1947 to Ezra Klein, doing business as Terminal Trucking Co., for repacking and further handling. Klein was then in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Dunn v. . Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Railroad Co. v. PrattSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Reid v. FargoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bush v. MasielloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Aaron Flanzbaum, Doing Business Under the Trade Name and Style of Davaar Industries Limited v. M & M Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Van-Pak, Inc. v. Cavalier Storage Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965