Legal Opinion
Thompson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 13, 1928No. A-6479PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was informed against by the county attorney of Carter county, Okla.; the information, omitting the caption, being as follows:
“Now comes F. M. Dudley, the duly qualified and acting county attorney in and for Carter county, state of Oklahoma, and gives the district court of Carter county, state of Oklahoma, to know and to be informed that Luther Thompson did, in Carter county, and in the state of Oklahoma, on or about the 16th day of February in the year of our Lord, one thousand, nine hundred and twenty-six, and before the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pilgrim v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Cutler v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Blakemore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
- Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
- Shoemaker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WallisWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. MutchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939