Talbot v. Fire & Police Pension Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (W. J.), J.
Appellants have presented a motion to recall the remittitur, which was issued on January 2, 1935. Respondents characterize the matter set forth in the notice of motion as “confused and ambiguous” and charge that many false statements are made therein. Notice of appeal was filed on April 2, 1933, and upon notice duly given to counsel for appellants, the appeal was dismissed on November 2, 1934, for want of prosecution. It appears from the notice of motion now before us that the main reason advanced in support of the motion is based on the fact that appellants were *194unable to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gutelius v. General Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bryan v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Ellenberger v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- In Re GrunauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008