Legal Opinion
Clyde v. Hodge
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 11, 1969No. 17507PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, William Clyde, III, brought a diversity action in the district court charging that by mistake, undue influence, or fraud Emma Clyde Hodge and Edwin Hodge, Jr. (the Hodges) and other unnamed individuals caused Margaret Burns Clyde (settlor), appellant’s grandmother, to exclude him from participation in an inter vivos trust which was dated January 31, 1933. The Hodges, who were not beneficiaries under the trust, and their children, who were beneficiaries, were named as defendants, and all are appellees here. The trustee is not a party to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Huron Holding Corp. v. Lincoln Mine Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Eleanor Holm v. Morris Shilensky, Arthur Cantor and Charles Wohlstetter, as Executors of the Estate of Billy Rose, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Oney v. NeedhamOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by19 opinions
- Garter-Bare Company, an Unincorporated Association (A Limited Partnership), and Knut L. Bjorn-Larsen v. Munsingwear, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Rourke v. Amchem Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Eon CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Haynes v. Anderson & Strudwick, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
- Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. Umet TrustCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.