Legal Opinion

Stanisics v. McMurtry

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1902No. 11,763PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Cornish, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Day, C.

The plaintiff brought this action in the district court of Lancaster county against the defendants to recover for a breach of a covenant against incumbrances contained in a deed executed by the defendants to the plaintiff. The trial *762resulted in a judgment for the defendants, to review which the plaintiff brings error to this court.

The record shows that on July 16, 1896, the defendants conveyed to the plaintiff by warranty deed certain real estate situated in the city of Lincoln, Nebraska. The deed contained the following covenant: “And we do hereby covenant with said Theodore Stanisics…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Wagner v. NostrandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  2. Long v. MolerOhio Supreme Court · 1855
  3. MacLeod v. SkilesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Gilbert v. StockmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laclede Laundry Co. v. FreudensteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Bilby v. HalsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API