Legal Opinion

Lot Maintenance of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Tulsa Metropolitan Utility Authority

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 28, 2014No. Case No. 13-CV-0686-CVE-TLWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CLAIRE Y. EAGAN, District Judge.

Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Based On the Lack of a Justiciable Controversy (Dkt. # 13). Defendant Tulsa Metropolitan Utility Authority (TMUA) argues that Lot Maintenance of Oklahoma, Inc. (Lot Maintenance) has not suffered an injury in fact, that Lot Maintenance’s claim is not fairly traceable to the challenged ordinance, that Lot Maintenance’s injury is not redressable, *1319that prudential considerations caution against exercising standing, and that Lot Maintenance’s claim is moot. Lot Maintenance has responded and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Public Service Company of OklahomaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025
  2. Stephens v. Public Service Company of OklahomaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API