Legal Opinion

Wise v. Nixon

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada

Decided January 25, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge

(orally). This is a suit in equity to quiet title to two certain tracts of sulphur mining land, of 160 acres each, situate in Humboldt county, Nev. The complainant and respondents are residents of the state of Nevada. The jurisdiction of this, court is sought to he maintained upon the ground:

“That this is a civil action arising under the laws of the United States.”

A demurrer to the original complaint was sustained, and leave given to complainant to amend. Wise v. Nixon, 76 Fed. 3. A demurrer is interposed to the amended complaint upon the ground that:

“It appears on the face of said complaint…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Gold-Washing and Water Co. v. KeyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. In Re Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. California Oil & Gas Co. of Arizona v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
  2. Bellaire v. Interstate Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API