Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barretta v. Otis Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 29, 1997No. SC 15516Published

1DissentBerdon, J.

This case, in which an escalator came to a sudden stop causing a passenger to fall and sustain injuries, presents a classic example of the type of case to which the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur (“the thing speaks for itself’) has commonly been applied. Accidents involving elevators and escalators have consistently been identified as appropriate for application of the doctrine, because they are accidents for which direct evidence of negligence is frequently unavailable, but that, based upon common experience, would not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence. See Barwick v. United…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ebanks v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Kranda v. Houser-Norborg Medical Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Motiejaitis v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Jose Domingo Colmenares Vivas v. Sun Alliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API