Legal Opinion
Pinecrest Homeowners Ass'n v. Glen A. Cloninger & Associates
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 2004No. 73729-1PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
The Spokane City Council (City Council) determined that the rezone application of developer Glen A. Cloninger & Associates (Cloninger) could be processed prior to the drafting and enactment of a specific zoning ordinance called for in an immediately effective amendment of the Spokane City Comprehensive Plan. The superior court upheld the City Council’s land use decision, but the Court of Appeals then reversed it, prompting Cloninger’s petition for review. We reverse the Court of Appeals and affirm, as the superior court did, the City Council’s decision.
FACTS
Cloninger owns an eight-acre parcel…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Citizens for Mount Vernon v. City of Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Citizens for Mount Vernon v. Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Anderson v. City of IssaquahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Pinecrest Homeowners Ass'n v. Glen A. Cloninger & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- City of Olympia v. DrebickWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Olympia v. DrebickWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Cingular Wireless, LLC v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Cingular Wireless, LLC v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Pinecrest Homeowners Ass'n v. GLEN A. CLONINGER & ASS'NWashington Supreme Court · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.