Legal Opinion

Zagar v. Columbia Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1935No. 25474. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

During the year 1932 and up to approximately July 1, 1933, Fred Rea and another were co-partners engaged in the commission business in the city of Seattle. Pursuant to Rem. Rev. Stat., § 8293, the partnership filed its bond for the year 1932 in the sum of five thousand dollars, conditioned “for the benefit of all consignors having any cause of action against the commission merchant,” as required by law. For the year 1933, the partnership furnished a statutory bond with defendant, Columbia Casualty Company, as surety.

John Zagar sued the defendant surety company, claiming that, during the year…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County of King v. FerryWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Goodwyn v. Union Springs Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Bolen v. Farmers' Bonded WarehouseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Stutsman v. CookNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Sakris v. Eagle Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Tollefson v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  3. Chada v. TappOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Department of Agriculture v. AckermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API