Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beagley v. United States Gypsum Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1951No. 7531Published

1DissentDunford, District Judge

I must dissent from that portion of the prevailing opinion which sustains the trial court’s determination of the damages suffered by the plaintiff.

The rule that in a law case the appellate court will not disturb a trial court’s judgment unless the latter has mani*502festly disregarded determinative evidence, or that its conclusion in respect to such evidence is clearly against law» is unquestionably sound. But I think that the converse of the rule is equally sound, viz., that when the trial court’s judgment does disregard determinative evidence, or when its conclusions in respect to the evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shikany v. Salt Creek Transp. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Landon v. MoreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Dubie v. BataniMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Naylor v. FloorUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  5. School Dist. No. 17, Rogers County v. Eaton, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API