Legal Opinion · Dissent
State of New Hampshire v. Jeffrey Maxfield
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 19, 2015No. 2014-0200Published
1DissentConboy, J.
Because I conclude that the trial court did not err by interpreting RSA 625:8, V (2007) to require an inquiry into the reasonableness of the delay in executing an arrest warrant, I respectfully dissent.
“The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Breest, 167 N.H. 210, 212 (2014) (quotation omitted). ‘When construing the meaning of a statute, we first examine the language found in the statute, and where possible, we ascribe the plain and ordinary meanings to words used.” State v. Warren, 147 N.H. 567, 568 (2002) *683(quotation omitted). “We interpret a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Asmussen v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of SafetySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- State v. PhilibotteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. KnickerbockerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.