Legal Opinion
Mahood v. Caldwell
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 18, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFunk, P. J.
The parties in this court are in the same relation as they were in the court below, and will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants.
Plaintiff, Kent T. Mahood, filed his petition in the common pleas court under Section 6202, General Code. The material parts of the petition read: .
“Plaintiff says that on or about February 17, 1925, Stanley H. Caldwell owned and operated the Eobinson Service Station at 1538 Kenmore Boulevard. That the defendant Harry D. Shriber, owned and operated Shriber’s Service Station at 1603 Kenmore Boulevard, Kenmore, Ohio. That the defendants Francis S. Shoemaker and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. KrinskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905
- State v. CostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905
- Walker v. DaileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
- Dutton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coy v. CuttingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941