Legal Opinion

Coy v. Cutting

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1933No. 31,249PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action under our civil-damage statute (R. S. 21-2150), in which plaintiff seeks to recover for the loss of her means of support in consequence of the intoxication of her husband produced by Jamaica ginger sold him by defendant. The trial court sustained a demurrer to her evidence, and she has appealed.

Briefly stated, the petition alleged that plaintiff is the wife of J. P. Coy, upon whom she was dependent for her means of support and from whose labors and personal earnings she received her support; that early in March, 1930, he…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Monroe v. Hartford Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  2. Fest v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Healey v. CadySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  4. Landrum v. FlanniganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Bistline v. Ney Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ling v. Jan's LiquorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  2. Berkeley v. ParkNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Fleckner v. DionneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Demge v. FeiersteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Ray v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API