Russo v. Burns
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentTobias, J.
|,I respectfully dissent.
I find the majority errs by granting a remand in this case.
I start with the jurisprudential rule that candidacies for public office are favored and the courts should uphold a candidacy if an interpretation of the laws would promote the candidacy. Landiak v. Richmond, 05-0758, p. 7 (La.3/24/05), 899 So.2d 535, 541; Becker v. Dean, 03-2493, p. 7 (La.9/18/03), 854 So.2d 864, 869; Russell v. Goldsby, 00-2595, p. 4 (La.9/22/00), 780 So.2d 1048, 1051; Ogden v. Gray, 12-1314, pp. 3-4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/11/12), 99 So.3d 1088, 1091, ' writ denied, 12-2041 (La.9/17/12), 98 So.3d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Landiak v. RichmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Russell v. GoldsbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Becker v. DeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Williams v. FahrenholtzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- Scaglione v. JuneauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.