Legal Opinion

Mukthar v. Latin American Security Service

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 2006No. B183968PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLIER, J.

Appellant Tofik Mukthar, a cashier at a 7-Eleven store, brought an action against respondent Latin American Security Service, Inc. (Service), for its alleged failure to prevent an attack on Mukthar by a patron. Service brought a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted on the ground that Mukthar could not show that Service’s negligence was the cause of the assault. We conclude that it is a question of fact whether Mukthar’s injuries were caused by Service’s negligence. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment.

FACTS

Mukthar was working at the 7-Eleven store on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Artiglio v. Corning Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Delgado v. Trax Bar & GrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Leslie G. v. Perry & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Cohen v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kellermann v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  2. Lattimore v. DickeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Lichtman v. Siemens Indus. Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Taylor v. Trimble, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Janice H. v. 696 North Robertson, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API