Legal Opinion

Wright Medical Technology, Inc. v. Osteonics Corp.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided October 26, 1995No. 94-2650 GPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

GIBBONS, Chief Judge.

Before the court is the motion of defendants, Osteonics Corporation and Stryker Corporation, for dismissal pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This is an action for declaratory judgment filed by plaintiff, Wright Medical Technology, Inc. (Wright), to determine whether its new product, the BRIDGE Hip Implant, infringes on U.S. Patent No. 5,133,772 (’772 patent) held by defendants. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the court finds that no actual controversy exists and grants defendants’ motion for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Indium Corporation of America v. Semi-Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Arrowhead Industrial Water, Inc. v. Ecolochem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Genentech, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Company, and the Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McKee Foods Kingman v. Kellogg Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API