Legal Opinion

(HC) Russell v. Borders

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 5, 2019No. 2:17-cv-02487Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD RUSSELL, No. 2:17-CV-2487-DMC-P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 DEAN BORDERS, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, now a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a 18 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to the written consent of all parties 19 (ECF Nos. 12 and 14), this case is before the undersigned as the presiding judge for all purposes, 20 including entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Pending before the court is 21 Respondent’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Mark Brittingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. William D. Dunne v. Gary L. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Bailey v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Elbert W. Williamson v. Christine O. GregoireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API