Lubavitch v. Borough of Litchfield, Conn.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Doc. Nos. 88, 141) AND FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (Doc. No. 101)
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, Chabad Lubavitch of Litchfield County, Inc. (“the Chabad”), and Rabbi Joseph Eisenbach, bring this action against defendants, the Borough of Litchfield, Connecticut (“the Borough”) and the Historic District Commission of the Borough (“the HDC”) (collectively, “Borough defendants”); and Wendy Kuhne, Glenn Hillman, and Kathleen Crawford, members of the HDC (collectively, “individual defendants”), for declaratory relief and damages…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chabad Lubavitch of Litchfield County, Inc. v. Litchfield Historic District CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of PomonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of PomonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Chabad Lubavitch of Litchfield County Inc v. LitchfieldDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Chabad Lubavitch of Litchfield v. Litchfield Historic District CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.