Hoot v. Brewer
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1DissentDoyle, Justice
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion ordering that the name of the relator, Harmon Hoot, be placed on the general election ballot as an independent candidate.
It is undisputed that the provisions of the Election Code with reference to the placing of the names of independent candidates upon the general election ballot are mandatory and must be strictly complied with. McWaters v. Tucker, 249 S.W.2d 80 (Tex.Civ.App.—Galveston 1952, no writ); Geiger v. DeBusk, 534 S.W.2d 437 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1976, no writ).
The respondent has raised several irregularity issues in connection with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McWaters v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Geiger v. DeBuskCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Gray v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Pierce v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Shields v. UphamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.