Legal Opinion

Shields v. Upham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1980No. 6979PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Baxter Shields in this Original Proceeding seeks a Writ of Mandamus to require the State Republican Executive Committee to place his name upon the ballot in the Republican Primary as a candidate for State Representative of District 71 of the Texas Legislature. Relator chose to qualify as a candidate by filing a nominating petition rather than paying a filing fee. The State committee had a serious question as to whether the petition complied with the requirements of the Texas Election Code and refused to certify Mr. Shields as a qualified candidate.

The required elements of a nominating…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. McWaters v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Geiger v. DeBuskCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Gray v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re BellTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wallace v. HowellTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Pierce v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Hoot v. Brewer, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982
  5. Sparks v. Busby, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API