Stauffer v. Benson

Nebraska Advance Sheets STAUFFER v. BENSON 683 Cite as

288 Neb. 683

affirmatively showed that Hessler had met the legal standard of competency.40 [16] As to his claims of errors or misconduct at trial and ineffective assistance of counsel, such claims were inappropri- ate for coram nobis relief. The writ of error coram nobis is not available to correct errors of law.41 We find no error in the district court’s denial of a writ of error coram nobis. VI. CONCLUSION Except for Hessler’s argument citing to Martinez, the claims raised in Hessler’s second motion for postconviction relief either were…