Legal Opinion

O'Neil v. Gruhn

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1938No. 27049. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover for personal injuries, and for damages to an automobile. The defendants appeared separately, and each denied liability and affirmatively pleaded contributory negligence. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and against both defendants, in the sum of $10,250 for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, and $480 for damages to the automobile. Each of the defendants moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and, in the alternative, for a new trial, all of which motions were overrruled. From the judgment entered upon the verdict,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jaquith v. WordenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Frowd v. MarchbankWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Caylor v. B. C. Motor Transportation, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Pryor v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Sheffield v. Union Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eckerson v. Ford's Prairie School District No. 11Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Discargar v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Blaak v. DavidsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Thomas v. CaseyWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Biladeau v. PomerenkeWashington Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API