Legal Opinion

The Maipo

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 8, 1918PublishedCited by 8 opinions

in Admiralty. Suit by the Central Leather Company against the steamship Maipo. On motion for process against the respondent vessel.

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, District Judge.

This is in effect the renewal of an application that process be issued against this vessel, the Maipo. The vessel was recently here and ready to sail for another American port, when libelant sought process against her. It was necessary to decide quickly, and, while denying the motion for reasons outlined in a memorandum, leave was given to move again when the vessel returned here, so that a fuller consideration could be given to the questions involved. As the facts, especially in respect of the status of the vessel, are now quite clear, a brief restatement of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schooner Exchange v. McFaddonSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  2. The DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. In Re BaizSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. The AttualitaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
  5. Long v. The TampicoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Berizzi Brothers Co. v. SS PesaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. The PesaroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  3. The Carlo PomaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  4. United States of Mexico v. RaskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Rich v. Naviera Vacuba, S.A.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API