Legal Opinion

Long v. The Tampico

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 22, 1883PublishedCited by 23 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBrow, J.

The libels in the above cases were filed by the owners of the steam-tug doe, and all others in interest, to recover compensation for services alleged to be of a salvage character, in rescuing the Tampico and the Progresso from a fire which broke out at Pratt’s oil docks, on Sunday evening, August 8, 1880.

Salvage compensation has been recently allowed by this court for services rendered to the Cyclone, (ante, 486,) in the same fire. Some of the facts bearing upon the present claim are there stated, and need not be here recapitulated.

The Tamp'ico and the Progresso were two small steamers, about…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. The DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. The FidelityU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1879
  4. United States v. WilderU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1838
  5. The FidelityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1878

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Republic of Mexico v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. The Western MaidSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Compania Espanola De Navegacion Maritima, SA v. the NavemarSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Upper Skagit Tribe v. LundgrenSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. The PesaroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API