Legal Opinion

State v. Worley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1966No. 670PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

In the record on appeal, defendant sets. forth two assignments of error: (1) “The action of the State and Court in refusing to accept defendant’s plea to guilty of misdemeanor escape”; and (2) “(t)he action of the Court in entering and signing the judgment of record.”

In a criminal prosecution, if the State elects to accept the defendant’s plea of nolo contendere, the court’s authority to pronounce judgment in that particular case is the same as if there had been conviction by verdict or plea of guilty. S. v. Stone, 245 N.C. 42, 44, 95 S.E. 2d 77, 79, and cases cited; S. v. Stevens, 252 N.C.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. StallingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. State v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API