Legal Opinion
Pacific Maritime Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 8, 2016No. 13-35818PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “the Board”) challenges the district court’s ruling that it had subject matter jurisdiction to vacate an interlocutory decision of the Board issued under § 10(k) of the National Labor Relations Act (“the Act”). The district court held that jurisdiction was warranted under the rule of Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184, 79 S.Ct. 180, 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1958). We conclude that the district court had no jurisdiction over Pacific Maritime Association’s (“PMA”) effort to obtain review of a non-final NLRB ruling, as the Leedom…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Border Infrastructure Envtl. Litig. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- International Longshore & Warehouse Union v. ICTSI Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- In re Border Infrastructure Envtl. Litig.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Center for Bio. Diversity v. UsdhsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Ilwu v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.