Legal Opinion

Garford v. Hyder

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1929No. Civil No. 2771PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant in this case has wholly failed to file any abstract of record or copies of the reporter's transcript of evidence as provided by Rule 4 of this court. It is the duty of counsel appealing a case to prepare and file such an abstract and transcript as will present every question which it is desired that the court shall review. Nor will the court examine the original pleadings and record to supply this deficiency. LibertyMining Smelting Co. v. Geddes, 11 Ariz. 54, 90 P. 332;Donohoe v. E.P. S.W.R.R. Co., 11 Ariz. 293, 94 P. 1091;Daggs v. Howard Sheep Co., 16 Ariz. 283, 145 P. 140;Martin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. Bankers' Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Liberty Mining & Smelting Co. v. GeddesArizona Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Daggs v. Howard Sheep Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Donohoe v. El Paso & Southwestern RailroadArizona Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moreno v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API