Legal Opinion

D'agastino v. the City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 16, 2016No. 3D10-2704PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, J.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CERTIFICATION

Appellant’s motion for rehearing and for certification are denied. On our own motion, however, we withdraw our previous opinion issued on January 23, 2013, and substitute the following corrected opinion ■for the original.

This is an appeal from a final judgment entered on cross motions for summary judgment. Appellants contend, as they argued below, that section 112.533(1), Florida Statutes (2007), provides the exclusive means to investigate allegations of police misconduct, and the City of Miami Ordinance creating a Civilian Investigative Panel (CIP) to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. State ex rel. Holloway v. SheatsSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  3. E. B. Elliott Adv. Co., Henry F. Hill, Intervenor-Appellant v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Clines v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  5. City of Hollywood v. MulliganSupreme Court of Florida · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. D'Agastino v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  2. D'Agastino v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API